Journal Article
Published 2022
A Systems Approach to Managing Complex Engineering Assets: Exploring Shifts in Equipment Management and Reliability Enhancement Paradigms
Indexed 1 year ago
•
575 Views
Assoc. Prof. Burnet Mkandawire
Main Author
Mechanical Engineering
20 total publications
Biographical notes
________________________________________
Burnet O’Brien Mkandawire
(PhD (UKZN-SA), MSc Eng. (UKZN), BSc Eng. (Mw), Dip. Eng. (Mw), MIEEE (USA), R. Eng. (Mw), MMIE (Mw), Cert. Mtce. Mgmt. (Germany), Cert. Condition Based Maintena...
________________________________________
Burnet O’Brien Mkandawire
(PhD (UKZN-SA), MSc Eng. (UKZN), BSc Eng. (Mw), Dip. Eng. (Mw), MIEEE (USA), R. Eng. (Mw), MMIE (Mw), Cert. Mtce. Mgmt. (Germany), Cert. Condition Based Maintena...
Primary Author
Assoc. Prof. Burnet Mkandawire
Co-Authors
Assoc. Prof. Burnet Mkandawire
Abstract
Abstract: Literature shows that much research has been conducted on the co-production of climate
knowledge, but it has neither established a standardized and replicable model for the co-production
process nor the emergent learning patterns as collaborators transition from the disciplinary comfortzone
(disciplinary and practice biases) to the transdisciplinary third-space. This study combines algorithmic
simulation modelling and case study lessons from Learning Labs under a 4-year (2016–2019)
climate change management project called Future Resilience of African CiTies and Lands in the
City of Blantyre in Malawi. The study fills the research gap outlined above by applying a systemsapproach
to replicate the research process, and a Markov process to simulate the learning patterns.
Results of the study make a number of contributions to knowledge. First, there are four distinct
evolutionally stages when transitioning from the disciplinary comfort-zone to the transdisciplinary
third-space, namely: Shock and resistance to change; experimenting and exploring; acceptance; and
integration into the third-space. These stages are marked by state probabilities of the subsequent
stages relative to the initial (disciplinary comfort-zone) state. A complete transition to the third-space
is marked by probabilities greater than one, which is a system amplification, and it signifies that there
has been a significant increase in learning among collaborating partners during the learning process.
Second, a four-step decision support tool has been developed to rank the plausibility of decisions,
which is very hard to achieve in practice. The tool characterizes decision determinants (policy actors,
evidence and knowledge, and context), expands the determinants, checks what supports the decision,
and then rates decisions on an ordinal scale of ten in terms of how knowledge producers and
users support them. Third, for a successful transdisciplinary knowledge co-production, researchers
should elucidate three system-archetypes (leverage points), namely: Salient features for successful
co-production, determinant of support from collaborators, and knowledge co-production challenges.
It is envisioned that academics, researchers, and policy makers will find the results useful in modelling
and replicating the co-production process in a methodical and systemic way while solving
complex climate resilience development problems in dynamic, socio-technical systems, as well as in
sustainably mainstreaming the knowledge co-produced in policies and plans.
Keywords: climate change; complex social-technical systems; decision-support; systems-theory;
third-space-transition modelling
Systems
knowledge, but it has neither established a standardized and replicable model for the co-production
process nor the emergent learning patterns as collaborators transition from the disciplinary comfortzone
(disciplinary and practice biases) to the transdisciplinary third-space. This study combines algorithmic
simulation modelling and case study lessons from Learning Labs under a 4-year (2016–2019)
climate change management project called Future Resilience of African CiTies and Lands in the
City of Blantyre in Malawi. The study fills the research gap outlined above by applying a systemsapproach
to replicate the research process, and a Markov process to simulate the learning patterns.
Results of the study make a number of contributions to knowledge. First, there are four distinct
evolutionally stages when transitioning from the disciplinary comfort-zone to the transdisciplinary
third-space, namely: Shock and resistance to change; experimenting and exploring; acceptance; and
integration into the third-space. These stages are marked by state probabilities of the subsequent
stages relative to the initial (disciplinary comfort-zone) state. A complete transition to the third-space
is marked by probabilities greater than one, which is a system amplification, and it signifies that there
has been a significant increase in learning among collaborating partners during the learning process.
Second, a four-step decision support tool has been developed to rank the plausibility of decisions,
which is very hard to achieve in practice. The tool characterizes decision determinants (policy actors,
evidence and knowledge, and context), expands the determinants, checks what supports the decision,
and then rates decisions on an ordinal scale of ten in terms of how knowledge producers and
users support them. Third, for a successful transdisciplinary knowledge co-production, researchers
should elucidate three system-archetypes (leverage points), namely: Salient features for successful
co-production, determinant of support from collaborators, and knowledge co-production challenges.
It is envisioned that academics, researchers, and policy makers will find the results useful in modelling
and replicating the co-production process in a methodical and systemic way while solving
complex climate resilience development problems in dynamic, socio-technical systems, as well as in
sustainably mainstreaming the knowledge co-produced in policies and plans.
Keywords: climate change; complex social-technical systems; decision-support; systems-theory;
third-space-transition modelling
Systems
Year of Publication
2022
External Digital Object URL
Access Publisher / External Source
Journal Name
International Journal of Agile Systems and Management
Volume
15
Issue
1
Page Numbers
93-117
Related Publications & Research
Similar Research FieldsFeatured Top Researchers
“Academic success depends on research and publications.” — Philip Zimbardo
Dr. Kondwani Chidziwisano
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
Contributions
61 Works
Dr. Robert Suya
Physical Planning and Land Surveying
Contributions
39 Works
Prof. Harold Wilson Tumwitike Mapoma
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
31 Works
Assoc. Prof. Moses V. M. Chamba
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
30 Works