Review Article
Published 2020
A brief scrutiny of Malawi’s policy on nuclear power
Indexed 3 years ago
•
1539 Views
Dr. Estiner Katengeza
Main Author
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
9 total publications
Dr Katengeza, a Lecturer (Physics), has a diverse research experience on radiation and radioactivity having collaborated with the Japan Atomic Energy Agency for three years, with Hirosaki University for one year, Nagasaki University for one year, and...
Primary Author
Dr. Estiner Katengeza
Co-Authors
Dr. Estiner Katengeza
Abstract
Malawi’s 2018 National Energy Policy includes nuclear power as an energy option with an operational 100 MW targeted for 2035.
This paper challenges the scope of the policy on nuclear power by reviewing its implementation strategy and comparing it to the strategy established for coal in the same policy; some experiences from other countries; and documents by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) relating to establishing a national position on nuclear power and infrastructural requirements for a nuclear power program. It is found that the pro-nuclear position is uninformed, and targets are unrealistic owing to a lack of understanding of nature of nuclear power including the requirements for safety, security and safeguards, and nuclear infrastructure. It is apparent that neither consultation nor a proper analysis were comprehensively conducted for nuclear. Though the national energy policy suggests a national position for nuclear energy, the content does not demonstrate that the position was arrived at knowledgeably. Thus, nuclear power may presently be viewed as a potential energy option that is yet to be seriously considered. It is important to build an appropriate level of literacy on nuclear science and technology for policy makers,
This paper challenges the scope of the policy on nuclear power by reviewing its implementation strategy and comparing it to the strategy established for coal in the same policy; some experiences from other countries; and documents by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) relating to establishing a national position on nuclear power and infrastructural requirements for a nuclear power program. It is found that the pro-nuclear position is uninformed, and targets are unrealistic owing to a lack of understanding of nature of nuclear power including the requirements for safety, security and safeguards, and nuclear infrastructure. It is apparent that neither consultation nor a proper analysis were comprehensively conducted for nuclear. Though the national energy policy suggests a national position for nuclear energy, the content does not demonstrate that the position was arrived at knowledgeably. Thus, nuclear power may presently be viewed as a potential energy option that is yet to be seriously considered. It is important to build an appropriate level of literacy on nuclear science and technology for policy makers,
Year of Publication
2020
External Digital Object URL
Access Publisher / External Source
Journal Name
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Volume
45
Issue
4
Page Numbers
147-153
Related Publications & Research
Similar Research FieldsFeatured Top Researchers
“Academic success depends on research and publications.” — Philip Zimbardo
Dr. Kondwani Chidziwisano
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
Contributions
61 Works
Dr. Robert Suya
Physical Planning and Land Surveying
Contributions
39 Works
Prof. Harold Wilson Tumwitike Mapoma
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
31 Works
Assoc. Prof. Moses V. M. Chamba
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
30 Works