Journal Article
Published 2025
Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries
Indexed 1 year ago
•
670 Views
Mr. Blessings White
Co-author
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
4 total publications
Blessings White is a Research Associate at Centre for Water, Sanitation, Health & Appropriate Technology Development (WASHTED) at Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (MUBAS) with three years’ experience in field-based research in Water...
Research Fields & Tags
Primary Author
Fouzia Akter
Co-Authors
Dr. Kondwani Chidziwisano, Neiva Banze, Jenala Chipungu, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Ms. Mindy Panulo, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Ian Ross
Abstract
Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related
Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of
SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting
good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact
evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis.
Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of
SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting
good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact
evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis.
Year of Publication
2025
External Digital Object URL
Access Publisher / External Source
Journal Name
Nature Water
Volume
3
Issue
-
Page Numbers
571–579
Supporting Files & Downloads
Related Publications & Research
Similar Research FieldsFeatured Top Researchers
“Academic success depends on research and publications.” — Philip Zimbardo
Dr. Kondwani Chidziwisano
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
Contributions
61 Works
Dr. Robert Suya
Physical Planning and Land Surveying
Contributions
39 Works
Prof. Harold Wilson Tumwitike Mapoma
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
31 Works
Assoc. Prof. Moses V. M. Chamba
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
30 Works