Journal Article
Published 2020
Exploiting the emergent nature of mixed methods designs: insights from a mixed methods impact evaluation in Malawi
Indexed 3 years ago
•
1490 Views
Assoc. Prof. Christabel Yollandah Kambala
Co-author
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
16 total publications
Christabel Kambala is an Associate Professor at Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (MUBAS). She holds a PhD (University of Heidelberg, Germany), MPH (University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK), BSc Environmental Health (University of Malawi...
Primary Author
Manuela De Allegri
Co-Authors
Stephan Brenner, Jacob Mazalale, Adamson S Muula, Jobiba Chinkhumba, Danielle Wilhelm, Julia Lohmann, Assoc. Prof. Christabel Yollandah Kambala
Abstract
The application of mixed methods in Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) has expanded remarkably. Nevertheless, a recent review has highlighted how many mixed methods studies do not conceptualize the quantitative and the qualitative component as part of a single research effort, failing to make use of integrated approaches to data collection and analysis. More specifically, current mixed methods studies rarely rely on emergent designs as a specific feature of this methodological approach. In our work, we postulate that explicitly acknowledging the emergent nature of mixed methods research by building on a continuous exchange between quantitative and qualitative strains of data collection and analysis leads to a richer and more informative application in the field of HPSR. We illustrate our point by reflecting on our own experience conducting the mixed methods impact evaluation of a complex health system intervention in Malawi, the Results Based Financing for Maternal and Newborn Health Initiative. We describe how in the light of a contradiction between the initial set of quantitative and qualitative findings, we modified our design multiple times to include additional sources of quantitative and qualitative data and analytical approaches. To find an answer to the initial riddle, we made use of household survey data, routine health facility data, and multiple rounds of interviews with both healthcare workers and service users. We highlight what contextual factors made it possible for us to maintain the high level of methodological flexibility that ultimately allowed us to solve the riddle. This process of constant reiteration between quantitative and qualitative data allowed us to provide policymakers with a more credible and comprehensive picture of what dynamics the intervention had triggered and with what effects, in a way that we would have never been able to do had we kept faithful to our original mixed methods design.
Year of Publication
2020
External Digital Object URL
Access Publisher / External Source
Journal Name
Health Policy and Planning
Volume
35
Issue
1
Page Numbers
102-106
Related Publications & Research
Similar Research FieldsFeatured Top Researchers
“Academic success depends on research and publications.” — Philip Zimbardo
Dr. Kondwani Chidziwisano
Public Health and Environmental Sciences
Contributions
61 Works
Dr. Robert Suya
Physical Planning and Land Surveying
Contributions
39 Works
Prof. Harold Wilson Tumwitike Mapoma
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
31 Works
Assoc. Prof. Moses V. M. Chamba
Physics & Biochemical Sciences
Contributions
30 Works